spacer.gif (842 bytes) News Cuttings

If you are unfamiliar with this subject, click here first for a brief introduction.

Click here for more articles


spacer.gif (842 bytes) World Scientist Statement - First Update of Concerns (July 1999)

World Scientists' Statement launched in Cartegena, Columbia, during the UN
Convention of Biological Diversity Conference on the International Biosafety
Protocol, calling on all governments to:

* Impose an immediate moratorium on further environmental releases of
transgenic crops, food and animal-feed products for at least 5 years.

* Ban patents on living organisms, cell lines and genes.

* Support a comprehensive, independent public enquiry into the future of
agriculture and food security for all, taking account of the full range
of scientific findings as well as socioeconomic and ethical
implications.

World Scientists' Statement
First Update of Concerns - July 15th, 1999

Prepared by Dr Mae-Wan Ho & Angela Ryan
Open University, UK

BIOPATENTS

The article on TRIPS is now under review at the WTO. It is an opportunity
to exclude the new biotech patents from TRIPS. A scientific briefing was
produced for the Third World Network and circulated at WTO, by two of our
signatories, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Dr. Terje Traavik. The full document can
be found on our website:

It provides a glossary and detailed analysis of the relevant article in
TRIPS as well as corresponding articles in the EU Directive. The
briefing conludes:

All classes of the new biotech patents should be rejected from inclusion
in TRIPS on the following
grounds:

All involve biological processes not under the direct control of the
scientist. They cannot be regarded as inventions but expropriations from life.

The hit or miss technologies associated with many of the inventions are
Inherently hasardous to health and biodiversity.

There is no scientific basis to support the patenting of genes and genomes,
Which are discoveries at best.

Many patents are unethical ; they destroy livelihoods, contravene basic
Human rights, create unnecessary suffering in animals or are otherwise
contrary to public order and morality.

Many patents involve acts of plagiarism of indigenous knowledge and
Biopiracy of plants (and animals) bred and used by local communities for
millennia.

HAZARDS

1. Researchers at Cornell University published a study in Nature which
found that pollen from GM Bt corn could have lethal effects on the larvae
of monarch butterflies if it lands on milkweed, the plant upon which they
feed. Forty-four percent of the larvae were killed after 4 days, whereas
no mortality occurred in larvae fed nontransgenic pollen. The Cornell
University researchers say their results "have potentially Yprofound
implications for the conservation of monarch butterflies" and believe
more research on the environmental risks of biotechnology in agriculture
is essential.

Reference: Losey, J.E. et al (1999). Transgenic pollen harms monarch
larvae. Nature 399, 214.

2. A recent study on transgenic rice carried out at the John Innes
Institute supports previous evidence that there is a recombination
hotspot in the CaMV 35S promoter. Furthermore, most of the recombination
events analyzed were 'illegitimate' or nonhomologous and do not require
substantial similarity in nucleic acid base sequence. The recombination
events were also found to occur independently, in the absence of other
viral genes.

Our comment: Transgenic lines containing the CaMV promoter, which
includes practically all that have been released, are therefore prone to
instability due to rearrangements, and also have the potential to create
new viruses or other invasive genetic elements. The continued release of
such transgenic lines is unwarranted in light of the new findings.

Reference; Kohli, A. et al 1999. Molecular characterization of
transforming plasmid rearrangement in transgenic rice reveals a
recombination hotspot in the CaMV promoter and confirms the predominance
of microhomology mediated recombination. The Plant Journal 17(6), pp
591-601.

3. A new study reviews 8,200 university based trials of transgenic soya
varieties. It reveals that Roundup Ready Soybeans produce lower yields
compared to their non GM counterparts. The average yield drag in RR
soybeans was 6.7% and in some areas of the midwest the average yeild in
conventional varieties was 10% higher compared to Roundup Ready
varieties. Furthermore the analysis shows that farmers use 2 to 5 times
more herbicide measured in pounds applied per acre on RR soybeans
compared with other weed management systems. RR herbicide use exceeds
the levels on many farms using multi-tactic weed management systems by a
factor of 10 or more.

Reference: Evidence of the Magnitude and Consequences of the Roundup
Ready Soybean Yield Drag from University-Based Varietal Trials in 1998 by
U.S. agronomist Dr. Charles Benbrook, author of Pest Management at the
Crossroads and former Executive Director of the Board on Agriculture for
the US National Academy of Sciences. YAg Biotech Infonet Technical Paper
Number 1 July 13 1999. website

http://www.biotech-info.net/RR_yield_drag_98.pdf

3. A recent population-based study conducted in Sweden between 1987-1990
and including follow-up interviews clearly links exposure to Roundup
Ready herbicide (glyphosate) to non-Hodgkinis lymphoma and strongly
suggests glyphosate deserves further epidemiological studies.

Reference: Hardell, H. & Eriksson, M. (1999). A Case-Control Study of
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Exposure to Pesticides. Cancer 5, No 6.

4. A new paper reports chaotic gene silencing in GM plants and reveals
that each transformed plant expressed a different and specific
instability profile. Both transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene
silencing mechanisms were operating in a chaotic manner and demonstrates
that epigenetic (position) effects are responsible for transgene
instability in GM plants. These results indicate that transgene
silencing and instability will continue to hinder the economic
exploitation of GM plants.

Reference; Dr Neve M et al. (1999) Gene Silencing results in instability
of antibody production in transgenic plants. Molecular and General
Genetics 260:580-592.

5. Successful transfers of a kanamycin resistance marker gene to the
soil bacterium Acinetobacter were obtained using DNA extracted from
homogenized plant leaf from a range of transgenic plants: Solanum
tuberosum (potato), Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco), Beta vulgaris (sugar
beet), Brassica napus (oil-seed rape) and Lycopersicon esculentum
(tomato). It is estimated that about 2500 copies of the kanamycin
resistance genes (from the same number of plant cells) is sufficient to
successfully transform one bacterium, despite the fact that there is six
million-fold excess of plant DNA present.

Our comment: A single plant with say, 2.5 trillion cells, would be
sufficient to transform one billion bacteria.

Reference: De Vries, J. and Wackernagel, W. (1998). Detection of nptII
(kanamycin resistance) genes in genomes of transgenic plants by
marker-rescue transformation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257, 606-13.

6. Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria can occur in the gut at
high frequencies. This has been demonstrated in the gut of germ-free
mice. The ?germ-free? gut-environment can result from taking antibiotics..
In one experiment, tetracycline increases the frequency of horizontal
gene transfer by 20-fold. And vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
is found to colonise the gut when the mice were treated with
antibiotic.

Our comments: Antibiotic resistance marker genes can spread from GMOs to
bacteria and between bacteria, including those associated with infectious
diseases. Furthermore, the use of antibiotics will make resistance spread
more readily.

References: Persson et al (1996). Enetrococcus faecium in ex-germfree
mice. Microecology and Therapy, 24, 169-173.

Doucet-Populaire, F. et al (1991). Inducible transfer of conjugative
transposon Tn/545 from Enterocococcus faecalis to Listeria monocytogenes
in the digestive tracts of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother., 35, 185-7.

Whitman, M.S. et al (1996). Gastrointestional tract colonization with
vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an animal model. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 40, 1526-30.

7. Pathogenic bacteria capable of invading cells can act as vectors for
transferring genes into mammalian cells.

Our comment: Dangerous transgenic DNA can end up in the genome of our
cells, with the potential of causing a lot of genetic disturbance
including cancer.

Reference: Grillot-Courvalin, et al. (1998). Functional gene transfer
from intracellular bacteria to mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnology 16, 1-5.

Other relevant papers on our website:
Special Safety Concerns of Transgenic Agriculture and Related Issues
Briefing Paper for Minister of State for the Environment, The Rt Hon
Michael Meacher. (Prepared 7.4.99)
Report on meeting of scientists in Michael Meacher?s Office 10.4.99
One-bird ten thousand treasures - How ducklings in the paddy-field can feed
the
world.
Principle of substantial equivalence - excerpt from a full critique of
the FAO/WHO joint report on safety of GM foods.

Sign on at our website:  www.i-sis.dircon.co..uk


Signatories on the World Scientists Statement

July 15th 1999 (Total = 85)

Dr. Ted Steele, Molecular Immunologist, U. Wollengong, Australia
Angela Fehringer, Antropology Student, Austria
Prof. David Suzuki, Geneticist, U.B.C., Canada
Prof. Joe Cummins, Geneticist, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Dr Ruth Goseth, Dermatologist, ISDE, China
Dr. Tewolde Egziabher, Agronomist, Min. of the Environment, Ethiopia
Dr. Christine von Weisaeker, Ecoropa, Germany
Prof. Ervin Laszlo, President, The Club of Buddapest, Hungary
Dr. Vandana Shiva, Research Institute for Science and Ecology, India
Dr Muhua Achary, Environmentalist, St Josephs College, Bangalore, India
Dr. Bruno D?Udine, Behaviour Ecologist, University of Udine, Italy
Dr Giorgio Cingolani, Agricultural Economist, Italy
Prof. Atuhiro Sibatani, Molecular Biologist, Osaka, Japan
Dr Shiron Sugita, Plant Geneticist, Nagoya U. Japan
Dr Noeoru Tagishita, Plant Geneticist, Japanese Assoc. of Agro-Nature, Tokyo,
Japan
Dr Shing Shibata, Biosafty and Environmental Sociologist, The Civil
Rights Against Japan, Japan
Dr Farhad Mazhar, Ecologist, New Agricultural Movement, Japan
Dr Robert Mann, Physician, New Zealand
Prof. Terje Traavik, Virologist, University of Tromso, Norway
Prof Oscar B. Zamora, Agronomist, U. of Philippines Los Banos, Philippines
Dr Gregorio Alvar, Biotechnologist, Molecular Biology Dept.
Computense U. Madrid, Spain
Dr. Javier Blasco, Aragonese Ctr Rural European Information, Spain
Dr. Katarina Leppanen, History of Ideas, Gothenburg Uni, Sweden
Dr. Florianne Koechlin, Biologist, World Wildlife Fund, Switzerland
Verena Soldati Biotechnologist, Basler Appell, Switzerland.
Daniel Amman, Cell Biologist, Tech. Switzerland
Yves Schatzle, Agronomist and Economist, Switzerland
Prof. Arpad Pusztai, Biochemist, Formerly from Rowett Institute, UK
Dr. Susan Bardocz, Geneticist, Aberdeen, UK
Prof. Richard Lacey, Microbiologist, Leeds, UK
Dr. Michael Antoniou, Molecular Geneticist, Guy?s Hospital, UK
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Geneticist and Biophysicist, Open University, UK
Dr J. M. Kerr, Bioethics, Winchester College: Oxford U. UK
Dr Tom Wakeford, Biologist, U. of East London, UK
Prof. Brian Goodwin, Biologist, Schumacher College, UK
Dr. Patrick Holden Director Soil Association, UK
Dr Eva Novotny, U. of Cambridge (Retired), UK
Prof. Ian Stuart, Biomathematics, U. Warwick, UK
Dr. Vyvyan Howard, Toxipathologist, U. Liverpool, UK
Prof. Peter Saunders, Biomathematician, U. London, UK
Prof. Tim Ingold, Anthropologist, U. Manchester, UK
Dr. Robert C. Poller, Organic Chemist, U. London, UK
Gordon Daly P.hD student, Gene Therapist, Kennedy Inst. London, UK
Stuart Daly P.hD student, Transgenic group, Charing Cross Hosp. UK
Peter Preston-Jones, M.Sc. Environmentalist, UK
Dr. John E. Hammond, Engineer, Highfeild, UK
Dr. Philip Kilner, Cardiologist, Royal Brompton & Harefield, UK
Dani Kaye M.Sc. Scientists for Global Responsibility London, UK
David Kaye M.Sc. Scientists for Global Responsibility, London, UK
Angela Ryan, Molecular biologist, Open Univ. UK
Prof. David Packham, Material Scientist, U. Bath, UK
Dr. David J Heaf, Biochemist, Wales, UK
Dr Alan Currier, Taxonomist, IRBV, UK
Dr Gesa Staats de Yanes, Veterinarian Toxicologist, U. of Liverpool, UK
Barbara Wood-Kaczmar M.Sc. Science Writer, UK
Dr Gene S. Thomas, Agriculturalist, UK
Prof. Martha Crouch, Biologist, Indiana University, USA
Prof. Ruth Hubbard, Biologist, Harvard University, USA
Prof. Phil Bereano, Union of Concerned Scientists, U. Washington USA
Prof. Martha Herbert , Pediatric Neurologist, Mass. Gen. Hosp. USA
Prof. David Schartzman, Biologist, Howard U. Washington DC USA Prof.
John Garderineer, Biologist, U. Michigan USA
Dr Walter Bortz, Physician, Palo Alto, USA
Dr. Mahua Acharya, Biologist, USA
Dr. Catherine Badley, Biologist, University of Michigan USA
Dr. Gerald Smith, Zoologist, U. Michigan, USA
Vuejuin McKersen M.Sc, Natural Resource Manager U. Michigan, USA
Dr. John Soluri, Historian of Science, Carnegie Mellon U USA
Juiet S Erazo PhD student U. of Michigan USA
Dr. Juette Peufecto, Biologist, U of Michigan USA
U.V. Kutzli Ph.D. Candidate, U of Michigan USA
Kristin Cobelius M.Sc. Student, U. Michigan USA
Lena S Nicolai PhD Student University of Michigan USA
Marial Peelle, Biol./Anthropologist Undergrad. Swarthmors College USA
Dr. Ty Fitzmorris, Ecologist, Hampshire College USA
Dr. Caros R Ramirez, Biologist, St Lawrance University USA
Rosa Vazquez Student in Biology, Ohio State University USA
Sean Lyman Student Gettysbury College USA
Ryan White Student St Lawrence University USA
Dr. Nancy A Schult, Entomologist, U of Wisconsin-Madison USA
Dr. Brian Schultz, Ecologist, Hampshire College USA
Dr. Douglas H Boucher, Ecologist, Hood College USA
Dr. Timothy Mann, Geographer, Hampshire College, USA
Chris Picone M.Sc. Soil Microbiologist, U. Michigan USA
Dr. Peter M. Rosset, Ins. for Food and Development Policy, USA

In summary, we call upon our Governments to:

* Impose an immediate moratorium on further environmental releases of
transgenic crops, food and animal-feed products for at least 5 years.

* Ban patents on living organisms, cell lines and genes.

* Support a comprehensive, independent public enquiry into the future of
agriculture and food security for all, taking account of the full range
of scientific findings as well as socioeconomic and ethical
implications.

Institute of Science in Society
42 Manor Road
High Barnet EN5 2JJ
tel. 44-181-441-6480

Or, sign on at website: www.i-sis.dircon.co.uk

 

spacer.gif (842 bytes)

Home / Overview / News Cuttings / Other Related Articles  / Contact